![]() There is another which I have disabled: Adblock Warning Removal List. ![]() For example, I am using almost all of the available Adblock Plus filters on my regular FireFox browser. When you install Adblock Plus, it uses filters to block certain traffic. Someone may worry about browser fingerprinting.Yeah,add a extension makes your browser more unique than those who add nothing,but beware most ads(maybe JavaScripts,maybe iframes,maybe flash,maybe HTML5 or others)are always tracking your online activities.Those companies are tracking you,and they can`t be trusted,they are willing to sell your personal information to anyone or just give it out when the government in your country asks for it.And attackers love to put malicious code in ads(ad images or videos ) So which is more dangerous?įrom what I understand, the Tor browser is a modified Firefox browser. This would allow users who are going to install one anyway, to be a more homogeneous set.ĭon`t worry,Adblock Plus is an open-source extension ,you can see source code here : If they dare to put a backdoor for collecting information,they will be reveled in a short time and no one will trust them,then their product will die.Įdited:A open-source software doesn`t mean it will never have any backdoor or deadly bug,but compare to close-source software,it is more safety for everyone can check the code and find bugs(or backdoors)more quickly if it has them,especially when there is a big community about develop and test.Tor project have this community,Adblock Plus have it too.So I choose to trust Adblock Plus. I feel the Tor Browser should ship with an ad-blocker, with a sensible configuration, that is disabled by default. This is, ultimately, fragmenting anonymity sets. However, that being said people want ad-blockers (not all people all of the time but some people some of the time) and the Tor Browser not shipping with something like ABP or uBlock means that more people are likely to just install some ad-blocker and configure it themselves. ![]() They have legitimate reason to not want to allow some third party to provide a text file that says what will or will not load on the internet for their users. The Tor Browser should ship with a default ad-blocker. ![]() You should not approach ad-blockers in the belief that they make you less trackable, instead they should be approached as a means to improve your browsing experience if you (like I do) find ads offensive. If you subscribe to every list in the world, you will still be subject to tracking because blacklisting never works with 100% efficacy. If you were to use Tails' uBlock Origin version, lists and configuration you would appear like a Tails user, which would give you a reasonable anonymity set.Īd-blocking is censorship, you allow third parties to define what you can or cannot see on the web.Īd-blocking does not defeat tracking. Tails ships with uBlock Origin in it's Tor Browser (something that no other answer actually touches on?). Using less common lists or special lists will make you stand out further. An adversary can craft a website to enumerate blocking from common lists to determine which website elements you do or do not load, and thus which lists you subscribe to. Longer version:ĭisabling javascript will not stop it being fingerprintable, an observer can still watch the resources you do or do not load. Tails uses uBlock Origin, if you use the same version, lists and config as Tails you can block most ads and keep a reasonable anonymity set, or you could just use Tails.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |